On January 27 the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) announced its 2008 statistics for patent filings. China moved up in the rankings, to number six globally, nearing tech leaders, such as Korea, and  surpassing the UK, Canada and other developed countries. At the same time, a Chinese company tops the ranking of corporate patent-filers for the first time, surpassing patent-mavens Panasonic, Philips and, well, everyone else because that is what it means to be number one.

That company, of course, is China’s bellwether Huawei Technologies - fuel to the fire for Huawei’s famed ‘wolf-culture‘ of hard work, passion, and ruthless competition.

I thought this news about Huawei was worth posting because it is a significant globally-recognized data point supporting the trend of China’s drive to be more innovative. In Supertrends of Future China, we noted China’s increased spending on R&D through its universities and research institutes (in various public and public-private partnerships), increased domestic patent filings, and relocation of multinational R&D centers to China (especially after new tax credits were introduced in 2007 / 2008’s revamping of corporate tax policy). All of these are indicators of a concerted effort to make China a more technology-intensive country, with two caveats.

First, it should be noted that WIPO patent filings are not an accurate reflection of domestic patent applications or patents granted overall. WIPO’s ranking refers to patents filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), in which a patent must be successfully filed in a signatory country or region before it is accepted under WIPO’s PCT for global protection. The PCT system enables the filing company to protect its intellectual property in 153 Contracting States with a single application, thereby significantly reducing costs and partially solving the problem of establishing and protecting IP in foreign territories.

Second, in terms of the individual company patent filings, Huawei coming in first for the first time does not necessarily indicate a broader trend of Chinese companies becoming more innovative. Filing under WIPO’s PCT could merely indicate how aggressively a company intends to defend patents abroad. WIPO’s PCT makes this much easier, as mentioned in the previous paragraph. Furthermore, a precipitous decline in patent filings in 2008 by Philips and Panasonic was more likely the true cause of Huawei’s placing first. With only one other Chinese company - ZTE - in the top 100, China’s strength in patenting versus that of global competitors is still negligible.

However, is there any additional evidence concerning patents that supports the contention that China is indeed becoming more innovative? For that, you could look to domestic applications and patents granted by the State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO). In this regard, China appears to be getting more innovative, with about 317,000 patents granted overall in 2008 (Jan - Nov 2008), up from about 301,000 patents granted in 2007 (Jan - Dec 2007). If you go back further, to 2006, less than 224,000 patents were granted. Globally, China ranks number three in patent-intensiveness, ahead of Germany and Korea (and behind world-leaders US and Japan).

All of the above figures, it should be stated, do not speak to the quality of the patents, and I have not provided a breakdown of patents by type (inventions vs. incremental improvements, for example), but an examination of the data on SIPO’s statistics page does show increases in invention and design patent categories that are slower than overall patent growth in China. Therefore one conclusion might be that China’s large number of patents filed owes more to brute force improvements rather than quality innovation.

Also, it will take China some time to reach the state of the art, but this is still a good indicator of progression on China’s long march up the global value-chain.

Chalk one more up for Huawei’s wolf-culture. At least for now, it is leader of the pack.

Over the Chinese New Year, I noted an article about Haibao, the aquatically-ambiguous official mascot of the Shanghai World Expo 2010. The article, titled “Haibao Idea Born in a Cafe,” has the best explanation yet of how Haibao’s design was conceived.

According to the article, which profiled the creator Wu Yongjian, a professor of design,

Chinese culture needed to be the essential element to embody the spirit of World Expo 2010. “A large number of mascot designs to express Chinese culture were inspired by images of pandas, monkeys and dragons, etc,” says Wu. “What I did was try to find another way to interpret China, a more abstract way.”

Perhaps referring to the Olympic Fuwa as an example of the oft-overused panda design motif, Wu’s explanation of how Haibao was conceived answers some of the Netizen-led criticisms of it apparently being the figment of the designer’s TV-addled mind.

After several changes to the initial submission of the Haibao character were made, a design was finalized that incorporated the imagery of the Chinese character ren - 人 - in the color of ocean blue, perhaps connecting the mascot to the host city Shanghai (the character for Shanghai’s hai is also one of the characters in Hai bao). Indeed, the deeper meaning of the mascot was expressed in the article in this way:

Like an ocean, Haibao symbolically represents a city where all values and ideologies can coexist.

Ummm, ok. Back in September 2008 John Pasden of the Sinosplice blog discussed how the five Olympic Fuwa of Friendliness were finally fading into obscurity. Today only the echoes of their alliteration remain, signaling the impermanence of all things. To John’s dismay however, in Shanghai the Fuwa have been replaced by the emergence of Haibao. As of late, Haibao is indeed everywhere. (The charmingly creative installation pictured above was found bordering the Jing’an Sculpture Park).

But back to the subject of the Shanghai Daily article, Haibao’s origins, Wu Yongjian’s dilemma is this: From the release of Haibao back in 2007, the creator has been accused by Netizens of the Chinese blogosphere of, to put it kindly, being influenced by Growing Pains, the classic 80s TV show, which became one of China’s most popular TV imports.  Ask any 80s or 90s-generation Chinese and they’ll likely know Chengzheng de Fannao and might even remember how Ben Seaver’s room was decorated:

Western readers will recognize the character on Ben’s wall as Gumby, an American icon of rubbery fun, so it is perhaps more correct to say the designer was influenced by Gumby rather than Growing Pains, but Mr. Wu is not going to come out and say, “Yes, I copied it!” The Daily article gives a measured and authentic-sounding explanation for how Haibao evolved, but the true initial conception of Haibao may never be known except to Mr. Wu himself. I am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt. Nevertheless, China has a large number of similar-looking logos and trademarks that could stand a bit of re-branding, in my opinion.

Although it is not exactly a Supertrend in and of itself, we put  the need for more brand development into our book’s chapter on the evolution of the service and retail sectors in China. I was also discussing this with a new friend who moved to Shanghai and set up shop as a brand consultant last year. Business is going well.  If you’re looking for a good brand-builder, drop me a line and I’ll put you in touch. I will also follow the topic of branding in a later post.

Happy Chinese New Year.

Monday, China’s $586 billion dollar stimulus plan appears to have positively reverberated around the world’s stock markets. China’s own indicies were up more than 7 percent, while major indexes in Asia were up 2 to 5 percent on Monday. Even Europe got in on the fun, with its major indexes up 1 to 2 percent. Is the world going Keynesian again, returning to 70s era deficit spending? Will a huge financial spending package in China be enough to mollify stock markets, ending their bear runs?

I am not normally one to attribute rhyme or reason to the movements of stock market indexes. In most cases, only a fool would say how a market is going to move on any given day. Yet today, with the news from China’s central government that it would encourage its domestic market to invest and consume more, it appears to have moved markets in a straight-forward correlation. Certainly, Chinese investors have come to expect the government to step in to prop up stock markets. Last week, it was a rumored $50 billion ‘buffer fund’ that prompted China investors to rally.

US investors are not so easy to impress. The Chinese spending package was not enough to dent the malaise over the US markets, which today were hit by the new of the bankruptcy filing of a major electronics retailer, Circuit City, and layoffs at the US subsidiary of DHL. Finally, the spectre of a slew of possibly negative economic data to be released later this week, including the trade balance, may be prompting caution.

But, back to China, the relatively huge gains in China and other Asian markets indicates, to me at least, that China’s economic news does have the power to help stimulate regional stock markets. But will the package, as China’s leaders claimed, actually help stabilize the world economy? Put another way, can China’s economy save the world’s?

To elaborate on that point, one must not imagine that China will quickly start spending its half trillion dollars to ramp up imports, thereby helping its trading partners. The main effects of this package will be to further push China’s economy toward domestically-fueled expansion via consumption and investment.  It is China’s biggest package ever, the equivalent a $2 trillion package for the US economy, but it will do little to help the world economy, other than encouraging a stable China.

China can afford the package without running a huge deficit, but is there any other cost? Inflation, possibly. One thing is clear, China is most definately now a Keynesian. I hope it can avoid the fate of Japan of the 90s, which tried, and is still trying, to spend its way out of the economic doldrums. Nobody wants to see another lost decade.

The first trading day after the Asia-wide three-day holiday, and following the weekend announcements of Lehman Brothers Chapter 11 filing and the buyout of Merrill Lynch, China’s stock markets dropped in tandem with Asian and world markets.

China Supertrends has been following the financial implications of the sub-prime crisis for a while now and will comment on this latest development and the state of China’s stock markets in a separate post. Today, Tuesday, September 16, was yet another blood-bath in the markets, but at a time like this it is worth remembering that China’s underlying economic fundamentals remain very strong.

In fact, China just came off yet another strong month of growth. If this is true, what causes the apparent contradiction of one of the world’s best performing economies having one of the worst-performing stock markets?

In brief answer to this complex question, let’s just say that the theory of decoupling - the idea that China and other developing countries are mature enough to continue to develop on their own during an economic decline in the US and elsewhere - is increasingly discredited.  We wrote as much in Supertrends: We are living in an inter-connected world, and nothing, not even neo-Mercantilist policies, a protected currency, nor the world’s largest foreign reserves, can resist the forces that are sweeping our world.  As John Donne famously said, no man is an island. This financial crisis calls to all governments to act.

China, with its strong economic performance in August and year-to-date, may appear to be in the eye of the storm, an island of calm and prosperity. Last week was the Mid-Autumn Festival, and the economists at China’s National Bureau of Statistics were producing new data faster than mooncakes at Wang Jia Sha. Virtually everything seems according to plan.

Starting with the drivers of the economy, consumption continued to show signs of strength, with retail sales maintaining a 23.2 percent pace of growth in August, only slightly lower than July’s 23.3 percent, the fastest rate since 1996, according to the Shanghai Daily.

The level of retail sales growth is far above the most recent inflation levels, meaning retail sales growth is not just about price increases, there is real growth there.  In fact, CPI - the consumer price index, or basic inflation - decreased to 4.9 percent in August, continuing the downward trend, but worrisome PPI - the prices producers are paying for raw materials and commodities - continued to climb, to 10.1 percent in August. PPI increases will, at some point, either result in decreased margins and profits as companies absorb the increases, or get passed on to consumers as price increases, so China is not out of inflationary woods yet.

Many were regarding the fight on inflation to be one of China’s core economic policies of 2008, but in a surprise move today the People’s Bank of China decided to cut interest rates by about a quarter percent, down from 7.47 percent to 7.2 percent and, in perhaps the most surprising move of all, cut the reserve ratio by a full one percent after having just increased it by one percent in June.  Now that the Olympics are over, micromanagement of the economy seems back in style.

But the message, that the economy is ready for a rate cut and wants to increase money supply, could be evidence that the PBOC overshot the mark and caused money supply to shrink too quickly, contributing to some of the summer’s abysmal stock and real estate performance.  Growth in M2, the money supply, decreased to 16 percent in August, down from 17.4 percent in June.  It is important to point out here that we are still talking about an increase of 16 percent, just that the rate of speed it was growing simply slowed down a little.

Is the PBOC acting wisely or foolishly? Time will tell if they are cutting too soon, a knee-jerk reaction to the latest sub-prime casualties, trying to prop up the falling stock and property markets, or if they are presciently avoiding a much harder crash in the wake of Fannie/Freddie/Lehman fallout and other factors yet to come.

While some of this data could be construed as negative, China had a lot of other positive economic results in August. For example, the trade surplus is up by 25.7 percent year-to-date, compared with Jan - Aug 2007 figures.

In August, with industrial output growth the lowest in 18 months, a mere 12.8 percent increase, exports decreased to 21.1 percent from 26.9 percent in July. Imports were down more dramatically, from 33.7 to 23.1 percent, mostly because of commodity import price decreases  (i.e. oil), so the trade surplus actually still got bigger. 

Though slowing its rate of increase slightly, clearly China’s export prowess is not affected significantly by the world-wide financial crises, and despite the 2008 increase in  the strength of the RMB exporters seem to have adapted. The sky, it woud seem, is not falling, though its perhaps a paler shade of grey. Ecnomists, analysts, and the Chinese media make a lot of dire proclamations about how the Chinese economy is in decline but this is better thought of as healthier, sustainable growth.

I could go on. FDI and other investments - still strong. Foreign reserve size- still troubling, but thanks to the Fannie Mae / Freddie Mac bailout, the 20 percent of reserves held in US mortgage debt appears safe.

So the question originally posed, why is there a contradiction? China’s strong economy (with all the usual provisos and assumptions about the data, of course) on the one hand, and its weak stock and property markets on the other. What gives?

Is this a sign that global markets cannot decouple and are doomed to falter together, or is it a sign that somebody needs to act more decisively?  Just as China became a stabilizing force in the Asian Financial Crisis of 1997, is there are way it could use its economic and financial strength to do so again?

No country is an island in our globalized world.  Everybody has a stake.  With the alarm bells sounding, can China passively wait for the U.S. to get through its bailouts, and hope that the world financial system remains intact?  Or does this bell ring for another?  Whom does the bell toll for?  China, it tolls for thee.

In Supertrends, we wrote about how increasingly-younger working professionals are coming to China, sometimes right after graduation from an MBA program or even undergraduate school. This is a certain trend. Shanghai can even be called the new New York for its growing fashion, club, restaurant, and shopping scenes. And, in the city’s business sector, to paraphrase the immortal Frank Sinatra, if you can make it there, you can make it anywhere.  But are halfpats the new expats?

Halfpats are not an official job classification, just a collective term for people that go to another country to work on their own initiative, rather than being sent by their firms. They come as tourists or students, then stay as workers, sometimes for years. On the other hand, the classic expatriate, in China and elsewhere, is typically an older executive at the managerial level dispatched on a limited-term assignment from the headquarters to an office abroad.

Expats play an important role in bringing experience, trust, and corporate culture to a foreign office. For this, they are often handsomely rewarded with luxurious (compared to local standards) rent and food allowances, tax-differential subsidies, even hardship pay and medical evacuation insurance. A new article by Alan Paul in the Wall Street Journal ponders whether the traditional expat is the Neanderthal to the halfpat’s Homo sapien:

…these old school mainline expats may be endangered. There is another, growing group of expats in Beijing who are younger, more willing to move around and less expensive to employ.

All true.  But I disagree with the idea of halfpats significantly endangering the Neander.. sorry, expats.  Unlike their halfpat descendants, older expats have experience that callow youth simply cannot make up. Furthermore, the very thing that makes halfpats attractive - local presence, Mandarin-speaking, upwardly mobile skills - makes them into flight risks.  They have choices about where to work in China, and may not have a long-term commitment to the foreign firm.

A multinational company in China would be no more likely to hire a halfpat instead of an expat than it would to hire an inexperienced Chinese manager. Every survey I have seen still says there is a shortage of management talent in China, whether foreign or local. The key of course, is management talent.  A halfpat may be extremely competent but, for company politics if for no other reason, nobody is handing them the keys to a multimillion dollar China operation.  So the premise that Paul puts forward is - and I think he must get this, too - partly flawed.  Expats and halfpats are apples and oranges.

Full disclosure, I am a halfpat based in Shanghai.  And, like all halfpats, I sometimes lament the fact I am not an expat.  It is true, I have no luxury villa, no car with driver, nor tuition subsidy to send my kids to school.  I don’t even have kids!  But, like many other people coming to China without a work sponsorship, I gave up comfortable and higher-compensated jobs in other countries for the chance to be here. It was a chance worth taking. And, like that other Sinatra song, “…regrets, I’ve had a few, but then again too few to mention.”

Contrary to the implied conclusion of Paul’s article, that halfpats are going to be replacing expats, I believe that the demand for expats is as strong as ever, and halfpats are a mutually exclusive quantity which may also be increasing, for that matter.

Many foreign firms are still expanding in (or even just entering) the China market, requiring foreign management staff. A recent announcement showed that companies choosing Shanghai as their regional headquarters are still on the increase, now numbering 206, up from just 41 in 2003. While the current HR practice in China is to try to follow a local or local-plus (i.e. the aforementioned halfpats, such as haigui returnee Chinese, or foreigners already living in China) hiring policy, there are not yet enough qualified halfpat candidates available for top organizational positions.

We may also study the preferred habitats of expats to guesstimate their numbers. For example, expensive serviced apartments can be an indicator of expat populations. To make a generalization, halfpats get much lower salaries and little or no housing allowance, so few can afford the US$1500 - $15,000 monthly rents on a serviced apartment or villa in Shanghai. We can therefore take growing supply of luxury residences (as long as they are filled) to mean that the expat market size is increasing. Singapore’s Frasers Property, previously featured in our article on the redevelopment of Shanghai’s Wujiang Road, plans to open 20 new serviced apartment buildings in China by 2010, half of its global increase during that period.

Paul’s WSJ article also points to a barrier for new or returning halfpats:

Longer-term visas have become harder to obtain in China. Many of the visa brokers often employed by halfpats have been shut down and there are rampant stories about expats without full-time employment having to leave China, at least for a while.

But then he continues with the common expectation that visa restrictions will be lifted at the end of September or October after the Paralympics are over, once again swelling the ranks of halfpats. I’m personally not so sure. On the ground in Shanghai, my impression is that during this period of visa tummult, China-based businesses quickly adapted: For example, English schools put their best staff on permanent work visas, and other companies that depended on unlicensed foreign workers made the switch to locals.  There is only unofficial rumor to go on in regard to the government policy after September: While longer business visas are likely to return, the requirements may still be strict.  Young halfpats, however, are nothing if not flexible and creative.

So, while China still remains an extremely attractive place to work in the minds of many young foreign graduates, the job market for those workers is tight, and I don’t expect a big influx of halfpats to displace more-experienced expats anytime soon.

Attention big company managers: Rest easy on your imported beds and high thread count sheets this night, your jobs are not in danger from Mandarin-speaking Young Turks just yet.

Related Information:

Rich Brubaker at All Roads Lead to China has been following the halfpat story for some time, I recommend you check out a few of his posts on the topic here and here.

Can organic vegetables grow in China’s depleted soils? Won’t environmental pollution offset any gains from eating healthy? Aren’t vegetables here, produced by China’s 500 - 600 million farmers, already dirt-cheap? These are just some of the questions I had about a year ago, when a Chinese entrepreneur pitched me on an idea that seemed so ridiculous that I had to remind myself of one of the traditional entrepreneurial litmus tests: If you’ve got an idea so crazy that everybody thinks you’ve lost your marbles, on the contrary you just might be onto something.

In a nutshell, this fellow had agricultural and academic connections to be parlayed into a network of greenhouses. They would be rented to foreigners who wanted to grow their own food. An integrated coffee shop and walking tour would allow people to hang around and watch their vegetables grow precariously from the ceilings. It was to be located in Shanghai’s picturesque and rural Fengxian district.

Although I knew something about the locavore and LOHAS (Lifestyle of Health and Sustainability) concepts, I still wondered if there were really enough green-thumb foreigners in the city to rent his greenhouses and farm their own produce.

“No problem!” he said, “We have people who do the actual farm work.” And what’s more, fresh ten kilogram baskets of the organically grown fruits and vegetables would be delivered to customers’ doors weekly. Ah, a garden without the work! Now he might be onto something.

I passed on the opportunity to invest but recommended the entrepreneur instead focus his marketing on the emerging middle/upper class of Chinese consumers who would be more than eager to eat up healthy vegetables at inflated prices. It turns out I was at least partly right. Before I get to that, let’s review a little Olympic context for organic foods in China.

In the wake of a poisonous dumpling scandal which rocked China-Japan relations in early 2008, China’s pre-Olympic food preparations suffered one indignity after another: The US planned to boycott the Olympic Village food altogether, Australia had to be banned from bringing its own food into the Village (including, it seems, copious quantities of Vegemite - Australia’s favorite spread), and the Olympic Village cafeteria itself would offer only 30 percent of the menu from China’s famous local cuisines. Then perhaps the ultimate loss of face for Chinese gourmands: Usain Bolt’s pre-world-record-setting meal? Chicken nuggets.

I mention the Olympics for its effect of kicking China’s organic foods production up a notch. In order to reassure Olympians - and the world - that China’s food chain was safe, no expense was spared. From RFID-encoded shipments to pigs having Mozart played on their final walk to the abattoir, safety was the number one priority. Number two was health.

In the run up to the Olympics, China has embraced organic foods extremely rapidly. Despite the fact that China has been a producer of organic foods for decades, just two years ago it was hard to find locally-available organic foods in even the foreign-owned hypermarts. Now, fresh, locally-grown organics are not only found in major grocery stores and served in top restaurants, they are even joining the ranks of DIY products.

Vegetable gardens put the commune back in China

Last week in the Shanghai Daily, a pair of organic food stories caught my eye, but this one about the People’s LOHAS Commune in Qingpu District was especially relevant given my experience with the farm/coffee shop/vegetable gallery I was told about last year:

The 33-hectare commune includes 27 hectares of farm land, and a 7-hectare eco-lagoon. The farm is divided into four parts - an orchard, a flower garden, an organic Chinese medicine farm and a vegetable farm.

For only 3,000 yuan (US$441) a year, you can have 3 hectares of land to grow any plant you like, even expensive ginseng.

In Supertrends of Future China, we discuss the growing trend in China of consumers seeking high-quality alternatives and upgrading their lifestyle, adopting activities such as LOHAS originally found in more affluent countries. We believe the trend is just getting started in China, although a number of incumbent businesses such as popular Shanghai eateries Element Fresh and Jujube Tree are already benefitting from the growing segment of health-conscious consumers. The Commune’s proprietor, Xie Lun, seems to share our optimism:

“The People’s LOHAS Commune welcomes everyone who loves nature as long as they observe two simple rules,” Xie says. “The first is no spitting and the second is that other people’s produce must not be taken without their permission. ”

So far more than 400 people, most white-collar workers, have applied to be members of the commune even though it will not officially open until next year.

Although China’s organic food industry is clearly only for affluent locals and foreign residents at this time, this is indeed a trend to watch and get positioned for. China’s own version of Whole Foods of Trader Joe’s may not be far behind.

In Supertrends of Future China, we discuss the need for localization of products and services when foreign companies come to China. We take it one step further, saying that products from the Chinese market are going to have a big influence on the lives of people outside of China as well. Think instant noodles or traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) as two early examples. China’s large market will encourage firms to create products suitable for local use, and some of the best will boomerang back. We call this Sinofication.

Back in October last year, Coca-Cola made news in China by establishing a research center specifically for products related to TCM ingredients. This announcement was important for two reasons. First, Coca-Cola showed how important China’s market was by increasing R&D spending there and, second, that the functional foods and beverages category (especially in Asia) is a growing trend.

While the kinds of beverages being developed are still kept secret, they could be standalone products (Coca-Cola makes teas, juices, and bottled water in addition to sodas) or a new variant on the original Coke recipe: Traditional (Chinese Medicine) Coca-Cola, anyone?

In fact the company is in a good position to benefit from a potential Coke-TCM concoction: Coca-Cola, originally containing cocaine from Coca leaves, was created as a tonic (”Coca-Cola Revives and Sustains” - 1905 slogan), and, in China, Coca-Cola is commonly given as a home remedy for some maladies by boiling it together with ginger and lemon, served hot to the patient (this is also a popular drink in many Hong Kong-style restaurants). Coke Adds Life? It may yet, if the TCM research bears fruit.

A recent article illuminated a few new details of Coca-Cola’s plan:

Cao Hongxin, the president of the China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, said that the center “has a few projects” with Coca-Cola.

“Generally speaking, we want to create drinks that relieve fatigue and help the body fight off diseases,” he said. “(Coke executives) all hope to develop a Chinese-medicine-based beverage quickly.”

The director of the research center, Zhang Huaying, said of potential TCM-based beverages that “The aim is to be global but the source of the knowledge comes from China.”

We think this is a growing trend. Products influenced by their China localization or innovated from scratch in China will make greater inroads into global markets. Bubble tea, green tea extracts in just about everything from shampoo to anti-cancer preventative supplements, and China-influenced designer bags are just the start. Solar water heaters, solar-powered everything actually, invented elsewhere but perfected in China, are among the country’s next big exports. That, and TCM Coke.

Huge numbers capture the imagination, while some numbers merely surprise, and still other numbers only reaffirm or validate an expectation. China’s Internet users now top 253 million, the highest globally. This announcement by the China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC) falls into that final category: After all it was only a matter of time before China’s Internet users surpassed those of the formerly-number-one (and birthplace of the net itself) United States, because China’s overall Internet usage rate even now stands at less than 20 percent, versus more than 70 percent in the US.

Since the time of the Great Wall and its first population estimates, China has been a nation of superlatives. Currently it has the longest bridge, the fastest train, the biggest shopping mall, and so on. We even covered this in Supertrends of Future China as the propensity to over-build infrastructure for

1. expected growth (Bejing’s new T3, the world’s biggest air terminal and building);
2. prestige or attention-getting (how about the once-planned 13-mile concrete dragon project);
3. and lack of financial restraints and stakeholder safeguards (easy lending terms, land grabs).

(In fact, a whole book was recently written about just the urbanization and infrastructure trends alone, the aptly-named Concrete Dragon)

Back to China’s Netizen population, I’m with ImageThief in believing the absolute numbers themselves are not as important the stories behind the data, the context. For example, what exactly are China’s estimated 253 million Internet users doing on the web?

A whole lot of blogging going on

China has more than 107 million blogs and spaces as of the end of June 2008, according to the latest CNNIC survey. This is up from 73 million last November, growing 46.5 percent. Active bloggers have increased to 70 million, up from 47 million last November, growing almost 50 percent in seven months. Who are the most popular bloggers?

Although QQ.com and 163.com are the recognized leaders in blog hosting in China, Sina.com hosts three of the top bloggers: Director/actress/writer/traveler Xu jinglei, singer/actor/writer/race car driver Han Han, writer/model/TV personality Acosta.

Each blogger has more than 170 million accumulated visits, with Xu Jinglei topping 180 million to be China’s (and by some measures, the world’s) most popular online personality.

Other rankings, such as BlogRank.cn, put Bill Gates’ personal blog as the 6th most popular, while a movie review blog written by a Chinese girl named duoduo is ranked number one, followed by another multi-talented actress/model/writer Yang Gongru.

It seems that China’s blogosphere rankings are ruled by the individual, unlike most US rankings, which tend to be dominated by gadget and gossip sites (e.g. Endagadget, Perez Hilton, Gawker) and collaborative works (e.g. The Huffington Post, BoingBoing), or the occasional celebrity blogger (e.g. Rosie O’Donnel).

China’s most popular blogs, on the other hand, retain a kind of casual atmosphere where down-to-earth celebrities write about what’s on their minds without slick product or site tie-ins. In China, monetization of blogger content (a la Google AdWords, or paid sponsorships) is only in its nascent stage and most popular bloggers elect to be site-hosted rather than self-hosted with their own URL. To be sure, some may be paid to post on those sites to draw in advertisers, but very few of the 70 million active bloggers would fall into that category.

Gawker recently lamented that too many people in the US blogged for free; in China, pretty much everyone blogs for free, and parlaying online popularity into real-life money or fame is a still seldom occurrence.

It’s clear to me that China’s blogosphere has much growth potential and opportunities yet to come.

(Come back for part two of this story on Monday.)

Last week in a major environmentally-themed speech in Washington, Al Gore called for complete elimination of carbon-based energy generation in the US within ten years. It was a bold statement, equivalent to Kennedy’s Man on the Moon address, and then some: Achieving his goal will not only require the full participation of the US government, but also that of every consumer in the United States, a far more ambitious effort than the manned moon landing. It’s an inspiring speech that I highly recommend:

Predictably some feel this is a long-shot, if not an impossibility. Yet perhaps that is the point: By aiming for the stars, at least we may reach the moon.

And I’ll go one step further to say that, if the US is to have any chance of success, China’s participation will be needed as well, to provide many of the products needed - the solar water heaters, the wind turbines, the batteries to store power in electric cars, among other things.

A growing number of Chinese firms listed domestically and abroad are positioned to profit from China’s own environmental woes by taking them as the newest business opportunities. We make this point in Supertrends of Future China (scheduled for release in about three weeks, just before the Olympics), where we devoted a full chapter to what we call the Greening Supertrend.

In brief, Greening is the intersection of China’s national environmental policy with the domestic and global trends towards clean energy and pollution reduction. A new generation of entrepreneurs in China is embracing this modern Green Revolution. By taking advantage of the domestic market size and manufacturing power, they will put China at the forefront of environmental technologies, first domestically and then, if present trends continue and Gore’s vision becomes a reality, globally.

Red Star Greening Over China

The central government has put green development as a prime objective of the 11^th Five Year Plan for China’s economy. The target is further outlined in the Five Year Plan for Environmental Protection. Many critics rightly point out that national policy is often ignored at the local levels, but last year’s promotion of the State Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA) to full ministry status is a sign of how seriously the central government is taking the issue.

Recently, the government has made some regulatory steps which are actually putting China in the lead of global environmental policy: For example, the plastic bag ban I discussed last week was announced, implemented, and accepted by the national population in just six months.

Replacing those bags with environmentally-sound reusable bags is just one of the new opportunities that China’s entrepreneurs have already jumped into. On a much larger scale, China’s wind and solar energy industries are taking center-stage.

The World Wind Energy Association currently ranks China as number five in a list of global wind users. China has approximately six thousand megawatts of generating capacity, about a quarter of world-leader Germany’s capacity, and not even one percent of China’s massive energy needs. Shi Pengfei, the vice-president of the Chinese Wind Energy Association, said that the National Development and Reform Commission had increased China’s target of wind-energy generation to 100,000 megawatts by 2020, five times as much as Germany’s present capacity.

Xinjiang Goldwind Science and Technology Company (SZ 02202), China’s leading wind turbine producer, went public on the Shenzhen stock exchange in 2007. Although large scale wind farms face many obstacles in China, such as an electric grid that is oriented towards cheaper coal-powered energy generation, on the strength of its domestic market growth, some analysts (additional link) believe Goldwind and other Chinese companies can rise in the next three years to challenge the world’s biggest turbine manufacturers including GE.

By 2020 the central government has pledged meeting 15 percent of China’s energy needs through renewable energy sources, including wind, biofuels, water, and solar. By 2050, the ratio is to be 30 percent including nuclear power. This means huge investments are required, but China is already a world leader in the use of at least one clean energy technology: Solar.

Star light, star bright

In many of China’s second, third or fourth tier cities, rooftops are covered by solar water heaters. The cheap, ubiquitous devices use the sun’s rays to heat water so that even rural workers can afford to take a hot shower after a long day’s work. In China, 200 million people have their water heated in this way, according to the NDRC. China has more than 50 percent of both the world’s production and use of solar water heaters, and other forms of solar energy are starting to grow as well.

Suntech Power (NYSE:STP) is the world’s third largest solar cell producer after Q-Cells of Germany and Sharp of Japan. It had US$1.4 billion in revenues in 2007. Revenues are expected to increase quickly as solar cell-generated electricity starts to approach price parity with carbon-based energy sources such as coal and currently high-priced oil.

The government is also active in solar energy policy, mandating that China should increase its current 100 million square meters of solar water heaters to 150 million by 2010, and 300 million by 2020.

With China set to take its place as the world’s largest economy by mid-century, its power needs will also dominate and, if it is not careful, the pollution problem will reach unprecedented levels. Green technologies promise to be among the best industries to be in during this challenging period of growth.  While China’s domestic market alone is a considerable prize for any green company, globally the potential is astronomical.  Gore’s call to action may help considerable to raise a green star over China.

Related Information:

A number of other commentators have written on China’s Green potential as a business opportunity. Here are a couple of articles that I recommend:

China: A Clean-tech gold rush

China’s Coming Environmental Renaissance

China’s Green Leap Forward

China’s Silver Lining

A possible Olympic legacy: A greener China

Sphere: Click here to see related content on other China blogs and news sites

]]> http://www.chinasupertrends.com/al-gore-ten-year-target-china-environmental-opportunity/feed/ http://www.chinasupertrends.com/g8-leaders-in-japan-pledge-to-halve-greenhouse-gases-china-cuts-more-free-plastic-bags/ http://www.chinasupertrends.com/g8-leaders-in-japan-pledge-to-halve-greenhouse-gases-china-cuts-more-free-plastic-bags/#comments Sat, 12 Jul 2008 11:10:51 +0000 Jason Inch http://www.chinasupertrends.com/?p=54

This week in Japan, the G8 leaders pledged to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 50 percent before 2050. In the same week, China announced it would immediately cut more free plastic bags. What is the main point of difference between these countries’ environmental policies? It could be summarized thus: More talk versus real action.

The G8’s move to cut greenhouse gases (primarily CO2) by 50% was immediately decried by some environmentalists and tagged as insufficient by the group of developing countries, including China, on the sidelines of the summit.

For example, the pledge didn’t even make clear whether the cut was to be from 1990 levels (as is the general practice of the UN and the Kyoto Protocol when measuring emissions reductions) or present levels, which would significantly decrease the impact of the pledge. The US in particular has increased carbon emissions in the subsequent 18 years by 20%. From a BBC report:

…the US has refused to set any interim targets for cutting emissions - and environmentalists have criticised the progress at talks as “pathetic”.

Five of the world’s biggest emerging economies said the G8 should increase its targets to more than 80% by 2050.

China, India, Mexico, Brazil and South Africa - who will join talks on Wednesday - also urged developed countries to commit to an interim target of a 25-40% cut below 1990 levels by 2020.

Meanwhile, in China, the Ministry of Commerce on July 11 announced changes to the plastic bag ban policy. Effective immediately, restaurants, bookstores, and clothing stores will also be required to eliminate free plastic bags, charging customers for each one issued. In fact, this was a clarification of the already-implemented plastic bag ban law, which came into effect on June 1 this year.

Is Red China Becoming Green?

One law eliminating free plastic bags does not a green country make, but I believe that China’s environmental policy is frequently unfairly derided by critics as unenforced. In fact, such a broad generalization is inaccurate: Here in Shanghai, it’s true that not every store has implemented the policy at present, and it seems many of the aforementioned clothing, restaurant and bookstores presumed the law was meant to apply to groceries only, but this loophole has now been closed. In hypermarts, supermarkets, and convenience stores, it is already impossible to get free plastic bags, so I expect the new revision will take effect quickly in restaurants and other venues.

In our new book Supertrends of Future China, we cover the plastic bag ban law as an example of China’s new environmental movement and the central government’s willingness to put its words into action. The G8 really should pay more attention instead of just making more hollow promises.

Related information:

For more details on the plastic-bag ban update, the resourceful China Environmetal Law blog has a post on the matter, describing the hitherto unknown-to-me existence of ‘produce department hooligans.’